Avatar

About Daniel J. Hassing

Daniel J. Hassing was previously a partner at the law firm of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, LLP in Omaha and a member of the firm’s transportation group, which advises clients on issues arising in the railroad, trucking, and aviation industries. He is licensed to practice law in Nebraska, Iowa, and Illinois and South Dakota. Dan is a private pilot and a remote pilot.
9 May, 2022

Iowa’s Certificate of Merit Statute Has Teeth

2022-05-09T10:56:23-05:00May 9th, 2022|LDM MedMal Forum, Litigation Tips, Medical Malpractice, Midwest Medical Legal Advisor|

In 2017, Iowa enacted a statute that aimed to dismiss meritless medical malpractice actions early in the case.  The statute, Iowa Code § 147.140, requires that a plaintiff provide a certificate of merit signed by an expert within 60 days of the defendants’ answer.  The certificate must address the standard of care and the defendant’s alleged breach of that standard.  If the plaintiff fails to provide such a certificate, the [...]

16 Feb, 2022

District Court Holds that 49 U.S.C. § 44112 preempts state tort claims

2022-02-16T12:54:08-06:00February 16th, 2022|Transportation Law|

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois recently held that a provision of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 44112, preempted state law negligence and strict liability claims brought against a former owner of an aircraft by the heirs of people who died in a plane crash.  See J.A.G.P. v. Aerolineas Damojh, S.A. de C.V., No. 1:19-CV-02552, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24858 (N.D. Ill. Feb. [...]

4 Feb, 2022

Nebraska Supreme Court Holds that Airplanes are Subject to Sales and Use Tax

2022-02-04T17:19:13-06:00February 4th, 2022|Latest News, Transportation Law|

In July 2021, the Nebraska Supreme Court decided an important case on the Nebraska sales and use tax and how it is applied to aircraft. In the case, Big Blue Express, Inc. v. Neb. Dep’t of Rev., 309 Neb. 838 (2021), the supreme court concluded that the “sale for resale” exemption found at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-2701.34 did not exempt an aircraft from sales and use taxes when the [...]

28 Jan, 2020

U.S. Supreme Court Set to Tell Us Specifics of What is Required for Specific Personal Jurisdiction

2020-01-29T14:39:49-06:00January 28th, 2020|Nebraska Litigation & Trial Advisor|

The long arm of personal jurisdiction. As our nation’s economy becomes increasingly interconnected, the concept of personal jurisdiction—which governs when a court can constitutionally bind a defendant with a judgment—has become all the more important. This is especially true in an era of litigation tourism where the venue in which a case has been filed can significantly impact the quality of justice the parties receive. In the past decade, the [...]

29 May, 2019

You Can’t Say That on TM

2019-05-29T14:28:06-05:00May 29th, 2019|Intellectual Property, Nebraska Litigation & Trial Advisor|

Last month, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Iancu v. Brunetti, 18-302, a fascinating case examining the intersection of the First Amendment and federal trademark law. At issue is whether Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act’s prohibition on the federal registration of “immoral” or “scandalous” trademarks is facially unconstitutional under the First Amendment. To understand the implications for Iancu, a little background is necessary. First, trademarks. Trademarks [...]

Go to Top