PLEASE! Don’t go back and change the health care records after a bad medical outcome. Jurors in Atlanta in late 2022 awarded a $75 million verdict against a pair of Georgia hospital physicians who did just that. The 32-year-old male patient was taken to the ER. It was alleged the physicians failed to diagnose a brain stem stroke for over a day causing catastrophic paralysis. The patient’s family alleged [...]
There is a great misconception that all of the plaintiff’s medical records may be used in your defense when your patient sues you for medical malpractice. That is not true. Generally, medical records are hearsay (out of court statements) and are not admissible in court proceedings to use in your defense unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies. Good news-there are such exceptions; bad news-the exceptions are not as [...]
In defending medical malpractice cases, we are often faced with issues pertaining to the accuracy of the medical records. It was originally thought that Electronic Medical Records (EMR) would provide a completely accurate contemporaneous record of what occurred in the medical care. Unfortunately, EMR is only as good as the efforts used to correctly input the data. Even the slightest discrepancy or ambiguity may result in protracted litigation. In the [...]
When recently defending my physician client in a medical malpractice deposition, Plaintiff’s counsel started asking questions outside the lines. I objected and he immediately retorted back that I did not know the Rules of Evidence and that his questions were legitimate. He claimed certain testimony privileges only apply in criminal matters. I stood on my objections and my physician client followed my lead and did not answer the questions. But [...]
In a case decided in June of 2014 described as “landmark,” the Washington Supreme Court held in favor of a physician as to claims of lack of informed consent. Generally, informed consent addresses the need for a physician to advise the patient of the risks, benefits and alternatives to certain treatment or procedures for a medical condition before the care is undertaken. The usual standard is then that a reasonably [...]
It happed in California several weeks ago. After 2 ½ days of jury deliberation, the jury awarded a $4 million verdict against a hospital for allegedly covering up the cause of the post-operative death of a patient. The jury did not find that the hospital committed malpractice and did not award punitive damages (which cannot be awarded in Nebraska). The patient had a surgical cervical disc. Post operatively he had [...]
When it is determined that a medical malpractice / professional negligence lawsuit or claim needs to be settled, or when one of the few times a jury sides with the patient, money is paid. Don’t be dismayed by what actually happens to the money. Between contingent fee lawyer contracts paying the plaintiff’s lawyers up to 50% (these actually happen in Nebraska), to exorbitant expert witness fees to huge health are [...]
You have been sued. How long until there is resolution of a professional negligence lawsuit? Six months? A year? Maybe two? Pyramids have been built faster than some cases get resolved. All participants want civil litigation over in a reasonable time, but medical malpractice lawsuits can become long and drawn out. As noted in the Nebraska Supreme Court opinion of Simon v. Drake, M.D.,285 Neb. 784, __ N.W.2d __ (2013), [...]
Many years ago, in a Nebraska gynecological case alleging medical malpractice, an oncologist testified favorably as to the applicable standards of care relating to the defendant physician. After the jury returned a verdict for the defense, the plaintiff appealed this inclusion of this expert witness’ opinions to the jury. The Nebraska Court of Appeals upheld the decision in Hoffart v. Hodge, M.D, 9 Neb. App. 161, 609 N.W.2d 397 (2000). [...]
